Lease Cars Covered Under Ohio Lemon Law

A local woman leases a vehicle from a dealership and gets a mountain of problems.

Mary Jean Ferrari leased a new Volkswagen Jetta in 2009.

After driving the car a few months, she started to see problems with the air conditioner.

She took it to the dealership where they could not find any problems.

Then, a few months later, the clutch completely went out on the car while she was driving on the freeway.

No one was hurt, and the car again was taken back to the dealership.

Because of the nature of the repair, a district manager from VW was called in.

 “Why would they send a district manager if it was just a simple thing like, ‘Oh, it’s an old clutch. It has to be repaired. This broke, literally … it broke,” Ferrari said.

After repairs were finished on the clutch, a diagnostic test was done. A problem was discovered with the air conditioner. That problem also was fixed.

Ferrari, feeling the car was now unsafe, wanted to return the Jetta.  

She asked the dealership and was told there was not much they could do and that she needed to contact VW leasing.

She called VW Financial and was told all they could do was give her one month off her lease payment but she would have to keep the car.

“I am not looking for any money. I am not looking for a brand new car. I just want to return this car,” explained Ferrari.

According to the Attorney General’s office, lease vehicles are covered under the Lemon Law in Ohio.

“But the coverage of the Lemon Law is for the first 12 months of the car’s life and/or the first 18,000 miles,” stated Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray.

Ferrari says she will be filing a claim with the Attorney General’s office since her problems started 11 months into her lease.

“I just feel on a brand new car this should not be happening,” Ferrari said.

NBC 4 also called the dealership about this situation, and they said they would talk to Ferrari again to see if they could help further.

If you want to start a claim with the Attorney General’s office, you can call them at 800-282-0515 or go http://www.ohioattorneygeneral.gov/.

For the latest news and information, stay with NBC 4 and refresh nbc4i.com.
To submit a story idea or news tip, e-mail stories@nbc4i.com.
MORE: NBC 4 Local News | Local Crime News
NBC 4 SPORTS: Sports News, Video
NBC 4 POLITICS: Headlines, Interactives Video

Vince Megna–$518000 Semi Truck Lemon Law Award

Lemon law legal expert Vince Megna discusses a recent victory in a Wisconsin lemon law case involving a semi truck. The judgment was entered a few days ago in the sum of $293,000 for the plaintiff. There is a stipulation that the defendant will pay $225,000 in attorney fees. Total will be $518,000.  (Biggest verdict for a semi truck anywhere)

This case is very important because most states don’t have lemon laws that apply to trucks. Texas makes an attempt at some lemon law relief, but no other state does. Also, the Federal Magnuson-Moss Act does not apply to trucks because trucks are not consumer products.
Bottom line is that owner/operators are left without any legal recourse all over the country when their trucks are defective.

Father and son win $293,000 verdict in semi-truck Lemon Law case

Wisconsin has the only state Lemon Law that covers semi-tractor trucks, and the Seemans of Janesville couldn’t be happier.

A federal jury recently awarded them $293,000 under that law for a defective rig that contributed to the failure of their small business, Jewell Trucking. Their attorney, Lemon Law expert Vince Megna of Waukesha, said it was the largest jury award in semi-truck Lemon Law case.

“Truck drivers aren’t millionaires,” Megna said. ” It’s a tough job for them to make money. When their trucks go down, it’s catastrophic.”

He said he can hardly believe other states’ Lemon Laws don’t cover trucks bought by owner-operators, and hopes the verdict might bring some attention to exanding that protection.

 “We get calls every week from drivers who bought trucks in other states, but we can’t help them.”

Randy Seeman and his son Jason, spent $177,000 on a new Western Star truck in 2007. They used it to haul sand, gravel and salt around Wisconsin and Iowa. For six weeks, it ran like a charm but in November that year, it lost power. The Seemans took the truck to authorized Detroit Diesel dealers all over the state, but the engine problems were never fully corrected.

They asked Freightliner, which owns Western Star, for a refund under the Lemon Law, but got no response, Megna said, and ultimately filed a lawsuit. An federal jury heard the case in Madison in November and found for Jewell Trucking.

The Lemon Law allows for a recovery of twice the purchase price plus interest payments if the case goes to trial. In addition, the court entered judgment for $225,000 in legal fees to Megna, who discusses the case in more detail in this video.

Meanwhile, the truck remains parked in Janesville, and the Seemans have returned to driving for other companies. Megna said the defective semi wasn’t the sole cause of Jewell Trucking’s demise.

“The business just didn’t make it, but this truck didn’t help.”

State’s lemon law bears fruit for Janesville trucker

ADVERTISEMENT

— Freightliner had a chance to settle for $55,000 but instead will pay several hundred thousand dollars after a federal jury sided in favor of a Janesville father and son in a lawsuit over a defective semitrailer tractor.

The case was tried under the state’s lemon law. Wisconsin is the only state that has a law that covers semitrailer trucks.

Randy Seeman and his son Jason paid more than $117,000 for the new truck in September 2007.

Their attorney, Vince Megna, said the truck developed engine problems and was in and out of several authorized repair shops around the state without a solution.

Megna said the Seemans asked Freightliner for a refund or a new truck, but they got no response. Jewel Trucking—the Seemans’ business—then filed suit.

A jury in November decided that the truck had at least one problem and that the problem continued after the fourth visit to a repair shop. The jury also determined that the truck was out of service for at least 30 days because of one or more problems.

The court ordered Freightliner to pay the Seemans $255,000—twice the amount of their actual losses allowed under the lemon law. It also tacked on interest charges and other costs to push the total above $290,000.

In addition, the court ordered Freightliner to pay the Seemans’ attorneys fees of $225,000.

Megna, who is a national lemon law expert with the Waukesha firm of Aiken Scoptur, said it was the largest jury award in semitrailer truck lemon law case.

Megna said the truck was in the shop 16 times for a series of engine problems. At the trial, an expert witness for Freightliner said trucks such as the Seemans’ often are in the shop 10 to 12 times in their first year, Megna said.

Megna said he found that testimony incredible. Apparently, the jury did, too.

“This truck really was a disaster,” Megna said.

He hopes the case draws attention to the fact that other state’s lemon laws don’t cover the big trucks.

“It creates an unfortunate playing field for owner-operators around the country,” he said. “I get lots of calls from truck drivers around the country, but unfortunately there’s nothing we can do.

“The small owner-operator is in such a dismal position; they’re operating on a shoestring, and they have no clout.”

Megna said large fleet operators are in a better position to deal with manufacturers over defective trucks. They have the muscle and buying power to demand satisfaction, he said.

“We’ve made a statement with this case, and somehow we’ve got to raise awareness of the issue these owner-operators face,” he said. “It’s not like all these other states have to come up with new laws, they just have to amend the laws that are already on the books.

“Maybe the best thing would be for all the drivers in neighboring states to come to Wisconsin to buy their trucks. That would bring attention to the problem.”

Megna said that the Seemans do not want to speak with reporters until the final settlement. In the meantime, the truck remains parked in their yard, although Megna said it would likely be returned to Freightliner.

Jewel Trucking is now out of business, the result of several factors including the defective truck, Megna said

Megna said that at one point in the case Randy Seeman was nervous about its outcome. He and Megna offered to settle the case for $55,000, and Freightliner countered with $33,000.

“At that point, we took our offer off the table and proceeded to trial,” Megna said.